How IVC filter lawsuit settlement is gaining popularity

Questionable Decisions Surround C.R. Bard Filters
July 12, 2016
greenfield filter complications
Three main concern for Greenfield filter implant
March 25, 2019

How IVC filter lawsuit settlement is gaining popularity

ivc filter lawsuit settlements

IVC filters are intended to trap the blood clots from traveling to the lungs and heart in the body.  Retrievable IVC filter implantation is typically given to patients who have been diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which causes the blood clots form in the pelvis and legs of the affected individual. While this device can assist in stopping the clots from traveling elsewhere in the body, it, unfortunately, is not a perfected product. Many patients have suffered extreme physical harm which continued for a lifetime.

ivc filter lawsuit settlements


With the plenty of records about the defective IVC filters, victims filed for claims demanding financial settlement for their pain and suffering. About 9-25% of IVC filters fracture and some particular devices hold higher fracture risk than others. A study in 2010 showed that 12% (or 6 out of 52 patients) using Bard G2 filters fractured than that compared to 25% of Bard Recovery filters that broke (or 7 out of 28 patients).


Major accusations

The ivc filter lawsuit settlements claims the following:

  • the manufacturing companies masked the potentially fatal complexities of these filters
  • did not mention the chance of filter fracture which can cause organ or severe nerve damage
  • kept on advertising the product as a safe medical device even after there were reports of serious health complications

FDA warnings

After receiving 921 reports of adverse events occurring after implanting the IVC filters since 2005, the FDA issued a safety health warning in 2010 for both the patients and the doctors. The agency put out a formal urge that the retrievable filters should be removed once they are deemed no longer necessary. More recently in 2014, they recommended how it is mandatory for the filters to be removed as soon as the patient’s risk of embolism is gone.

In the ivc filter lawsuit settlements, the main allegation has been against the flawed designs of these devices. Designed to prevent life-threatening pulmonary embolisms (PEs) – blood clots in the lungs, these filters have life-threatening side effects.

  • Embolization: This condition refers to the IVC filter migration that often happens that these flexible devices detach themselves from the particular place and breaks into pieces. These pieces migrate through the upstream blood and settle in different parts of the body causing health complications.
  • IVC Filter Thrombosis: blood clots are formed within the defective filters causing pulmonary embolism, lower back pain, painful swellings, and inflammation.
  • Perforation: While traveling through the blood upstream, the broken parts of the device might cause organ or nerve damage which can lead to internal bleeding.

The first lawsuit against Bard was filed in the state courts of California and Pennsylvania in 2012. The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) consolidated lawsuits against Cook in October 2014 from 11 districts to an MDL in the Southern District of Indiana. There was a huge rise in the number of ivc filter lawsuit settlements. However, today thousands of lawsuits are awaiting some sort of legal complication in the MDL.

Presently, there are a variety of litigation pending against the major IVC filter manufacturers such as C.R. Bard, Cook Medical, Johnson & Johnson, and Boston Medical. If you have suffered from the complications of such filter implant, visit the team of To get a free evaluation of the medical case, dial 1 (855)802-9471 or visit

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *